Opera got better?
- 10
- +
I decided to try Opera 9.6. I’ve used Opera before, quite a few times, and it always was just okay, but no worse than IE.
But now Opera 9.6 has made it better. Opera 9.6 is clearly faster. I will post more about Opera 9.6 later.




10 Comments
G. Liu
November 3rd, 2008
at 8:37pm
I have not yet tried Opera 9.6, but as far as I am aware, Opera sucks like crap. It’s bloated, has no features, and is notoriously difficult to customize. It’s just not user-friendly.
Darren VanBuren
November 6th, 2008
at 8:22pm
Bullshit. Themes are widely availabe and installing and using them is easier than in Firefox.
G. Liu
November 15th, 2008
at 2:20pm
Considering that Opera has a bulit-in theme catalogue, I guess you could be right. In my opinion, I like Firefox’s customization better, altough I’d like to point out that you can search addons from the Addons window in Firefox.
I downloaded Opera 9.6 for trial on my PPC Mac (10.4.8), and it turns out Opera gets an 85 on the acid3 test. It’s actually better than Firefox which got a 77/100.
For me, Opera 9.6 looks no different from Opera 9.5. They probably just fixed a few bugs.
For now, I’ll stick with my Firefox 3.0 browser. They say it has the best security.
Geoffrey Liu
December 19th, 2008
at 8:36pm
I am trying out Opera 10.0 (alpha) as I speak. It’s quite amazing that it can handle the snowflakes on this page WAY better than Firefox can. It’s also 15 to 20 percent faster.
The thing I don’t like about Opera is that every time I scroll down to the bottom of a page, there’s a black line. There is also a black border around the search box.
I may end up using Opera instead.
Geoffrey Liu
December 19th, 2008
at 8:38pm
AMAZING! Opera gets a 100/100 on the acid3 test. I thought that was impossible.
Darren VanBuren
December 19th, 2008
at 11:50pm
Firefox 3.1 > Opera 10. Enough said.
Geoffrey Liu
December 22nd, 2008
at 7:13pm
You are probably right. Opera 10 actually has a few display errors as mentioned above. On Vista, the sidebar is black and you can’t see anything. Besides, Firefox 3.1 isn’t out yet as of December 22, 2008. Right now, I am using Opera 9.6 and my friend claims that “it is the fastest browser”.
Darren VanBuren
December 23rd, 2008
at 1:00pm
The latest nightly from the 1.9.1 branch (Firefox 3.1) has the version string 3.1b3pre, so expect Firefox 3.1 soon. Firefox 3.1 adds a new JIT compiler for JavaScript, and builtin support of playing Ogg/Theora and Ogg/Vorbis files. Opera lags behind a lot. The fastest browser you will find will be Safari with a nightly build of WebKit, which has SquirrelFish Extreme.
Geoffrey Liu
December 23rd, 2008
at 7:51pm
That’s even more controversial to what I’ve heard. My nerd friend (no offense) says that Safari got a 20 or so on the acid3 test, a test for browser compatibility (?). I don’t think Opera’s lagging behind other browsers, though; I’ve tried it for a week and a half and it actually seems faster. The only downside is that super-advanced status bar in the address bar, which makes Opera seem slower.
Darren VanBuren
December 24th, 2008
at 3:27pm
Safari 3.2.1 should get about a 72, and a WebKit nightly under Safari’s hood makes it get 100. Opera is lagging behind.